Computer-Aided Phase Identification and Frame-To-Frame Analysis of Endodontic Asymmetric Reciprocation Rotation: A Preliminary Study




frame-to-frame analysis, high speed video analysis, image analysis, kinematics, phase identification


To perform a detailed evaluation of reciprocating motion using a computer-aided phase identification and frame-to-frame analysis, a continuous rotation at 300 rpm, RECIPROC ALL mode and WAVEONE ALL-mode were recorded with a high-speed camera. Movie files were automatically analyzed with digital video analysis and modeling tool. RECIPROC ALL mode parameters were 186.34°±1.02 at 428.32 rpm ± 7.61 and 65.07°±0.93 at 261.06 rpm ± 7.72; WAVEONE ALL-mode parameters were 191.39°±1.32 at 523.83 rpm ± 14.36 and 70.13°±1.26 at 316.06 rpm ± 8.75. The variability of rotational speed during the cycle and distinct acceleration –deceleration patterns, was similar for both reciprocating modes. The computer-aided frame-to-frame analysis revealed that asymmetrical reciprocating motion has more complex kinematics demonstrating high peak rotational speed values and different patterns of acceleration and deceleration. While there was a difference in reciprocating cycle duration and rotational speed, both cycles demonstrated a similar dynamic of rotational speed during the cycle.


Alilou M, Kovalev V (2013). Automated object detection and segmentation of the histocytology images using reshapable agents. Image Analysis & Stereology 32: 89-99.

Alilou M, Kovalev V, Snezhko E, Taimouri V (2014). A comprehensive framework for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in lung CT images. Image Analysis & Stereology 33: 13-27.

Bürklein S, Flüch S, Schäfer E (2019a). Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved canals: WaveOne and Reciproc versus WaveOne Gold and Reciproc blue. Odontology 107, 96–102.

Bürklein S, Stüber JP, Schäfer E (2019b). Real-time dynamic torque values and axial forces during preparation of straight root canals using three different endodontic motors and hand preparation. International endodontic journal 52: 94–104.

Capar ID, Arslan H (2016). A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J 49:119-35.

Cheung GS, Shen Y, Darvell BW (2007). Effect of environment on low-cycle fatigue of a nickel-titanium instrument. J Endod 33, 1433–7.

Dembia C, Liu Y, Avedisian C (2012). Automated data analysis for consecutive images from droplet combustion experiments. Image Analysis & Stereology, 31: 137-48.

Ertuğrul IF, Orhan EO (2019). Cyclic fatigue and energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy examination of the novel ROTATE instrument. Microscopy Res & Tech 82:2042-8.

Ferreira F, Adeodato C, Barbosa I, Aboud L, Scelza P, Zaccaro Scelza M (2017). Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic review. Int Endod J 50:143-52.

Fidler A (2014). Kinematics of 2 reciprocating endodontic motors: the difference between actual and set values. J Endod 40:990-4.

Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Gergi R, Culla A, De Angelis F, Di Carlo S, Pompa G, Osta N, Testarelli L (2012). Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 38:1408-11.

Grande NM, Ahmed HM, Cohen S, Bukiet F, Plotino G (2015). Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: a comprehensive review-part I: Historic perspectives and current applications. J Endod 41:1778-83.

Iacono F, Pirani C, Arias A, de la Macorra JC, Generali L, Gandolfi MG, Prati C (2019). Impact of a modified motion on the fatigue life of NiTi reciprocating instruments: a Weibull analysis. Clin Oral Invest 23:3095-102.

Irmak O, Orhan EO (2018). Kinematic analysis of new and used reciprocating endodontic motors in 2 different modes. Int J Artif Organs 41:17-22.

Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W (2012). Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 38:541-

Mabaso M, Withey D, Twala B (2018). Spot detection methods in fluorescence microscopy imaging: a review. Image Analysis & Stereology 37: 173-90.

Mapayi T, Tapamo J, Viriri S, Adio A (2016). Automatic retinal vessel detection and tortuosity measurement. Image Analysis & Stereology 35: 117-35.

Orhan EO, Irmak O, Ertuğrul IF (2019). Kinematics of a novel reciprocating endodontic handpiece. Int Endod J 52: 1235-43.

Orhan EO, Ertuğrul IF (2020). Cyclic fatigue life of novel rotary compactors: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Microscopy Res & Tech 83: 66-71.

Pedulla E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E (2013). Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 39:258-61.

Pirani C, Iacono F, Generali L, Gatto MR, Gandolfi MG, Prati C (2017). Impact of a modified kinematic on the fatigue life of reciprocating instruments. At: congress/brussels2017/absinfo/ESE-Brussels-2017-Oral-Presentations.pdf. Accessed on July 4 2019.

PROMARK Endodontic Motor Official Access date 13 April 2020.

RECIPROC Blue official Access date 13 April 2020.

Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr (1985). The ‘balanced force’ concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 11:203–11.

Robert-Inacio F, Oudinet G, Colonna F (2012). Ship classification from multispectral videos. Image Analysis & Stereology 31: 121-35.

Skwirczyński M, Gąciarz T, Skomorowski M, Wojciechowski W (2019). Automated measurement of foot deformities: flatfoot, high arch, calcaneal fracture. Image Analysis & Stereology 38: 161-72.

Yared G (2008). Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 41:339-44.

Zinelis S, Eliades T, Eliades G (2010). A metallurgical characterization of ten endodontic Ni-Ti instruments: assessing the clinical relevance of shape memory and superelastic properties of Ni-Ti endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 43, 125–34.




How to Cite

Fidler, A., Orhan, E. O., & Irmak, Özgür. (2020). Computer-Aided Phase Identification and Frame-To-Frame Analysis of Endodontic Asymmetric Reciprocation Rotation: A Preliminary Study. Image Analysis and Stereology, 39(2), 91–99.



Original Research Paper