Morphological Assessments of Root Apex of Permanent Mandibular First and Second Premolars in a Turkish Population

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.2577

Keywords:

Apical foramina, Apical morphology, Dentistry, Mandibular premolars, Medical image analysis

Abstract

There is no apical morphological data being available for mandibular first or second premolars in the Turkish population. The aims of the study were (I) to assess apical morphological data of mandibular first and second premolars in a Turkish population at a young-adult age range (II) to analyze potential correlations between the size and position of the apical foramina (AF). Extracted sound teeth were collected from an adult volunteer population as willing to donate. Morphological data were obtained from specimens using a stereomicroscope. The number, size, shape, and position of AF and frequency of accessory foramina were quantified. Mann-Whitney U and Spearman's rank correlation tests were performed (α=0.05). A total of 237 teeth were investigated. The majority of the specimens had one major AF. The frequency of major AF was between 1–3 for both groups. The median AF size in mandibular first and second premolars were 55,180 µm2 and 67,483 µm2, respectively. The majority of foramina shape was irregular for the mandibular first premolars whereas, was oval for the second premolars. The median location of AF with respect to the anatomic apex was 664 µm in mandibular first premolars and 677 µm in mandibular second premolars. The size and location of AF mostly overlap between the mandibular first and second premolars. The shape of the AF might be the only relevant variation concerning the apical morphology between the mandibular first and second premolars in young adults. The interaction between the size and location of AF in mandibular premolars of young adults seems not significant

References

Ahmed HMA, Versiani MA, De-Deus G, Dummer PMH (2017). A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology. Int Endod J 50:761-70. doi: 10.1111/iej.12685.

Arora S, Tewari S (2009). The morphology of the apical foramina in posterior teeth in a North Indian population. Int Endod J. 42:930-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01597.x.

Awawdeh L, Abu Fadaleh M, Al-Qudah A (2019). Mandibular first premolar apical morphology: A stereomicroscopic study. Aust Endod J 45:233-40. doi:10.1111/aej.12313

Awawdeh LA, Al-Qudah AA (2008). Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 41:240-8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01348.x

Biffi JC, Rodrigues HH (1989). Ultrasound in endodontics: a quantitative and histological assessment using human teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 5:55-62. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1989.tb00337.x

Blasković-Subat V, Maricić B, Sutalo J (1992). Asymmetry of the root canal foramina. Int Endod J 25:158-64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1992.tb00779.x

Calişkan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioğlu F, Türkün M, Tuncer SS (1995). Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 21:200-4. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80566-2

Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG (1984). The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramina. Int Endod J 17:192-8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1984.tb00404.x

European Society of Endodontology (2006). Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 39:921-30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x

Green D (1960). Stereomicroscopic study of 700 root apices of maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth. Or Surg Or Med Or Pa 13:728-33. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(60)90373-x

Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL (2001). Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 34:359-70. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00399.x

Hassanien EE, Hashem A, Chalfin H (2008). Histomorphometric study of the root apex of mandibular premolar teeth: an attempt to correlate working length measured with electronic and radiograph methods to various anatomic positions in the apical portion of the canal. J Endod 34:408-12. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.013

ISO 3630 (2019). Dentistry- Root-canal Instruments — part 1: General requirements and test methods. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization ISO 3630.

Kim E, Fallahrastegar A, Hur YY, Jung IY, Kim S, Lee SJ (2005). Difference in root canal length between Asians and Caucasians. Int Endod J 38:149-51. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00881.x

Kim S, Kratchman S (2006). Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod 32:601-23. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.010

Lu TY, Yang SF, Pai SF (2006). Complicated root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a Chinese population using the cross section method. J Endod 32:932-6. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.008

Marroquín BB, El-Sayed MA, Willershausen-Zönnchen B (2004). Morphology of the physiological foramina: I. Maxillary and mandibular molars. J Endod 30:321-8. doi:10.1097/00004770-200405000-00005

Open Microscopy Environment. URL: https://docs.openmicroscopy.org/bio-formats/6.6.0/supported-formats.html. [accessed: 12 April 2021].

Orhan EO, Dereci Ö, Irmak Ö (2017). Endodontic Outcomes in Mandibular Second Premolars with Complex Apical Branching. J Endod 43:46-51. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.006

Peiris R (2008). Root and canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Sri Lankan and Japanese population. Anthropol Sci 116: 123–33. doi:10.1537/ase.070723

Ricucci D (1998). Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Literature review. Int Endod J 31:384-93. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00184.x

Sert S, Bayirli GS (2004). Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod 30:391-8. doi:10.1097/00004770-200406000-00004

Song JS, Choi HJ, Jung IY, Jung HS, Kim SO (2010). The prevalence and morphologic classification of distolingual roots in the mandibular molars in a Korean population. J Endod 36:653-7. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.007

Stein TJ, Corcoran JF (1992). Radiographic "working length" revisited. Or Surg Or Med Or Pa 74:796-800. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(92)90412-j

Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L (1986). Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod 12:343-5. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80035-8

Vertucci FJ (1978). Root canal morphology of mandibular premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 97:47-50. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0443

Vertucci FJ (2005). Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics 10:3–29. doi:10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00129.x

Walker RT (1988). Root canal anatomy of mandibular first premolars in a southern Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol 4:226-8. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1988.tb00326.x

Wu MK, Wesselink PR, Walton RE (2000). Apical terminus location of root canal treatment procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med O 89:99-103. doi:10.1016/s1079-2104(00)80023-2

Zhang Q, Chen H, Fan B, Fan W, Gutmann JL (2014). Root and root canal morphology in maxillary second molar with fused root from a native Chinese population. J Endod 40:871-5. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.035

Zillich R, Dowson J (1973). Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Or Surg Or Med Or Pa 1973;36:738-44. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(73)90147-3

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

How to Cite

Babayeva, F., Orhan, E. O., & Irmak, O. (2021). Morphological Assessments of Root Apex of Permanent Mandibular First and Second Premolars in a Turkish Population. Image Analysis and Stereology, 40(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.2577

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper