For Reviewers

We value fair and constructive reviews. Whether recommending acceptance or rejection, please provide clear, helpful feedback to support the author’s improvement. If revision is suggested, specify what should be revised and, if possible, how. To ensure timely processing, we kindly ask that reviews be submitted within three weeks. If you are unavailable or cannot meet the deadline, please notify us promptly. If declining the review, suggestions for alternative referees are appreciated.

Key Evaluation Criteria:

• Relevance and originality of the manuscript
• Methodological soundness, data quality, and analytical validity
• Clarity of argumentation and completeness of content
• Overall organization and writing quality

Checklist for Review:

• Is the article within the journal's scope?
• Are the aims/hypotheses clearly stated?
• Are methods appropriate and well described?
• Does the work offer a novel contribution?
• Is the English language clear and adequate?
• Are conclusions supported by the data?
• Are the title, abstract, and keywords accurate and informative?
• Are figures and tables necessary, clear, and well-annotated?
• Are equations accurate and units appropriate?
• Are references relevant, sufficient, and correctly formatted?

Final Recommendation:

Please conclude your review with one of the following:

• Accept (no revision needed)
• Revisions Required (minor changes)
• Resubmit for Review (major revision)
• Decline Submission (reject)